Part of the normal DNA, of life, is that people aren’t capable of magic. People can’t fly, or create money out of thin air etc. But what if this is on purpose?
For the purpose of this article, I’m going to assume the following premise: magic makes itself impossible to humanity so that magic can undo reality.
With that premise in mind, it’s now necessary to see where that premise leads.
Magic that makes itself impossible, to humanity, is humanity not making itself possible to magic. Humanity not making itself possible to magic is not making anti possible to magic – not making anti possible to magic is making self possible to magic.
Making self possible to magic is anti possible to magic; anti possible to magic is impossible to magic – impossible to magic is magic not to impossible.
In normal logic, a possibility can be ascribed the meaning of magic. Thus, it stands to reason that in relation to the current process, magic not to impossible can be translated into magic not to reality – magic to magic.
Fantasy to fantasy, so that fantasy can undo reality. Fantasy to fantasy can seem like fantasy speaks to fantasy, but of course, if that’s the case then which of the two powers are the power to undo reality?
Fantasy undoing reality is reality creating fantasy. Reality that creates fantasy is the non-creation of fantasy – fantasy to fantasy, so that fantasy can’t be created.
Fiction to fiction is not to fiction. Not to fiction is fiction to. Fiction to is not to. Not to is the inability to travel.
Travel is impossible, so that magic can’t be experienced. Seeing as how travel equates to action, and action equates to reality, the actual premise in play is that reality can’t be experienced so that magic can’t be experienced – so at least the chronology is logical (because what on earth would be the point of making magic impossible so that reality is impossible?).
Reality is impossible (reality is itself) so that magic is impossible (magic is reality): reality gets to be itself so that magic can copy reality – weakness gets to be proud of itself so that power can copy weakness.
It should be the other way around: it should be that power copies weakness, and then that’s why weakness gets to be proud of itself. But it isn’t. The real genius, and the real inspiration of magic is that reality can be an inspiration to magic because reality hasn’t reason to be an inspiration – magic wants to believe in weakness because weakness wants to destroy magic.
On the one hand, I believe in this idea. However, on the other hand, I’m not yet convinced of the need to wrap up the analysis. A force that believes in a weakness (the absence of force) because the absence of force wants to end force is a non-force that doesn’t believe in a force because a force wants to help a non-force.
A non-force is an equality – an equality rejects hierarchy because hierarchy wants to help equality (that’s better).
Equality rejecting hierarchy is no structure rejecting structure (no structure no structure). No structure no structure because structure wants to help no structure is no structure no structure because structure wants to end structure – no structure no structure because structure wants to end structure is no structure no structure because nothing wants to help structure.
Nothing wants to help structure is structure wants to help structure – i.e. it’s only when a hierarchy can help itself that equality can help itself – and it’s only when a weakness can self-destruct that magic can self-destruct (and finally, it’s only when reality can help magic that magic can help reality).
Magic is the power to help, but, it’s only when reality duplicates magic without the help of magic that magic will intervene, and expose itself to reality.
To close: God wants to reveal their existence to the universe, however, God will only reveal their existence to the universe when the universe performs magic without any help from God.
