What is a hypnosis? Hypnosis is “a trance state characterized by extreme suggestibility, relaxation and heightened imagination.” It is a scientific technique that can promote accelerated human change. With Hypnosis, we can create desired changes in behavior and encourage mental and physical well-being. It is also a social interaction in which one person responds to suggestions given by another person for imaginative experiences involving changes in perception, memory, and the voluntary control of action.

What is Femininity? Recently there has been an inclination to downplay the distinction between male and female with a kind of pretence that we are all the equal. Men and woman have come to be seen as contestant rather than two complimentary but different forces of nature. Just as some men are more masculine than others so too are some women super-feminine. It’s not just how feminine women wear, it’s how they move, smile, talk and walk. Biologically the hormones determine femininity, but there are behavioral aspects of femininity you can develop.

What is a feminine hypnosis? Hypnosis can help you change your self- representation and automate new feminine behavior and lifestyle. It can even help increase the stream of female hormones in your body. Hypnosis works best when it is combined with real-world trial like hormone treatment, surgery or good old-fashioned feminization guidance. An important element of feminization is self-esteem because this significantly affects your new feminine appearance.

Feminization Image and Appearance

Full feminization can be achieved using hypnosis, a process that fills the mental, physical and emotional processes needed for a complete feminization. You have to try and find the perfect tone of your voice, the true pitch, and you will hear your inner voice, that is feminine inside out without being too forced.

By becoming more feminine a person can have better perception of color and shades, they can be more sensitive to the people around them, and be more accepting and gentle with their ways. It is a higher intuition that will set in and get a person more tuned into life and love. Women who feel that the world has de-feminized them can get back to their real self. Transgender individuals can transform themselves mentally, emotionally and physically using feminine hypnosis.

Femininity is never really about the way you look externally, but what you feel internally. It is the way to go back to your roots, to provide nourishment and strength to the mind and to connect with that inner woman that is inside all of us. While it is true that surgeries, clothes and make up help you look the part, it does not really provide you with essence tap the source of the feminine qualities. Bring about the intuitive control of the mind through feminine hypnosis.

Alter your impression and let the world see what you are and what you can be. By doing feminine hypnosis and calming your thoughts and getting them arranged, you can do better and let this inner strength shine all around you.

North India has always been a geographically strategic location and as such, it has been the center of political struggles for centuries. Though many rulers have come and gone, it has remained an immensely important political center. This has resulted in a very diverse and rich culture made up of different religions and communities that have influenced each other tremendously. The clothing fashions of this region are a great way to explore its multi-cultural nature. Though many of the most popular north Indian outfits, like the salwar kurta or the Punjabi suit, are quite traditional, they have evolved over the years to meet the demands of each new generation. The end result is a tremendous amount of variety in terms of cuts, colors and designs.

The most popular casual wear garment for men that is worn across Punjab, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh and many other north Indian states is the salwar kurta. It consists of a long, straight-fitting tunic and a pair of loose pants that gather at the ankles. The salwar kurta can be worn by men as well as women, though women typically go for the more feminized salwar kameez. This outfit was initially only worn by men as a casual wear outfit, preferred because of its comfort and versatility. It came in classic colors like white, beige and tan. The modern, fusion salwar kurta outfit is worn by both men and women and sometimes, the kurta is worn alone in combination with jeans or trousers. There are many different varieties of the salwar kurta, from the classic, loose fitting garments in neutral tones to the designer, modern versions with fitted silhouettes.

Today the kurta has become a huge trend in both Indian and western fashion. It is considered an Indian version of the stylish tunic top and comes in a plethora of different colors, designs, patterns, fabrics, necklines and sleeve styles. In north India, it has become as popular as the Punjabi salwar kameez, especially for casual wear amongst the younger generation. The kurta can be worn for daily wear as well as special occasions depending on the richness of the outfit. It is sometimes paired up with fusion garments like the Nehru jacket (which is a well-fitted jacket distinguished by its high, closed neck collar) to create a smart, formal look. The kurta and Nehru jacket combination is one of the most popular wedding ensembles for men in north India, along with more traditional garments like the silk salwar kurtas and embroidered sherwanis.

The emergence of online portals as the premier mode of shopping has really changed the face of fashion in India. Many of these classic north Indian outfits have become popular and in-demands across India. For men and women in different parts of the world interested in buying kurtas, pyjamas, salwars and Punjabi suits, online shopping has proven to be a great boon. Now, both traditional and classic varieties of these outfits can be easily purchased no matter where the customer is located.

The fairytale marriage comes to an abrupt end. The glass of the framed wedding picture has been broken. The living room furniture, once considered a place for family meetings and fellowship, has been divided; it will be termed “community property” in legalese and will be fought over in a family court between two parties. The husband and wife will spend hundreds, maybe even thousands of dollars arguing over “he said,” “she said,” “he did this,” “she said” – matters that will provide nothing more than an official public record for future reference by the two parties. When the immature behavior of the adults ceases, a judge will bring to the forefront the matter of child custody, more popularly known as the, who gets the kids issue.

If mother and father do not come to an agreement on the matter of custody, the judge will wield his powerful tongue and utter some combination of the words, “it is in the best interests of the child…” and will be the first to reprioritize the importance of the parental roles in the life of the child. “The best interests the child” is a phrase that has been thrown around in family court for decades, but in reality, as it pertains to determining matters of custody nothing could be further from the truth; the courts today overwhelmingly still favor mothers, and fathers wage war in unfair custody battles every day, often times coming up empty handed.

Certainly over the last century, many a father has sown into the breakdown of the relationships between the father and his children. However, over time our society and the U.S. court system have tipped the scales of custodial matters, favoring the mother and leaving the fathers in the cold, with the children’s security blanket in hand. The American family has not always been structured the way it is today. In fact, it was not until the mid 1800s and the rise of the Industrial Revolution that the role of the father in the home changed significantly. In her book, Fatherhood Politics In The United States, Anna Gavanas mentions that in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, fathers had important childrearing tasks: they were the primary custodians of the children, and they were mainly responsible for their instruction and moral guidance (7). It was very common for the children to be at the father’s side throughout the day as he carried on the tasks of farming the land, working a trade, such as a blacksmith – often taught to the children, maintaining the home, etc. But, with the rise of the Industrial Revolution, many fathers were moved out of the home and into factory jobs. Industrial society demanded that middle-class fathering revolve around workplace schedules instead of preindustrial, home-based economic conditions, where fatherhood was part of everyday work (7).

In time, this evolution would prompt the courts to reverse their course on custody matters. The irony of this chain of events is startling; the working father replaces the at-home father in order to build America. Unbeknownst to the father, while taking part in a societal transition that ultimately builds a nation’s workforce and economy, the family structure begins a slow deterioration, resulting in a demolition that ultimately brings the family unit crashing down.

Domesticity and family involvement became associated with femininity in the nineteenth-century market economy, and “masculinity” entailed defining fathers first and foremost as breadwinners (Gavanas 7). The mother assumed the role in the domestic capacity that the father had previously filled. As time would have it, the role of the father became increasingly less in the home and he became more known as the ultimate decision-maker, who had the final say. Most people who grew up in the baby boomer generation can remember mother’s weapon of last resort: “you just wait until your father gets home!” But to the child, fathers were seen as a source of entertainment when they returned home from a long day’s work; playing with the kids was common past time, but the father’s input of moral guidance lessened.

There is a misconception that the fathers role can be filled by the stay-at-home mother. Fathers play a pivotal role in the lives of children. Children receive much of their validation from the voice of a caring father. The continual input of a father’s advice and counsel, the image of the father as the backbone of strength and stamina that he symbolizes, and the affections and verbal affirmations from the father water the seeds of self-esteem, and weave the thread of moral fiber into the identity of the child. This is not only necessary, but also vital to the growth and maturity of a child, especially during the tender years.

In a 2004 Law & Society Review article, Julie E. Artis summarizes one of the foundational legal philosophies used in custody disputes: the tender years doctrine. Until the late 1960s, courts automatically awarded mothers custody based on the “tender years doctrine” – the notion that mothers have superior, “natural” nurturing abilities and a biological connection the their infants. Despite current gender-neutral custody laws, the idea that mothers are biologically connected to young children and infants (by breastfeeding, for example) may remain among some portion of the judiciary (770).

On the record, most lawyers and judges will say that the tender years doctrine is no longer being used in today’s custody disputes. Instead, they insist that the gender-neutral “best interests of the child” standard, which replaced the tender years doctrine back in the 1970s, is the prevailing philosophy and spoken rule for determining matters of custody. In fact, Oklahoma Law, under Title 43, Statute 109a, states: “In awarding the custody of a minor child or in appointing a general guardian for said child, the court shall consider what appears to be in the best interests of the physical and mental and moral welfare of the child.” It sounds fair, does it not? This law puts the child and the child’s best “interests” first. Therefore, the court system ensures that the child will always be in the better of the two homes. It ensures that the environment – part of the “best interests,” the “physical and mental and moral welfare,” and the best setting for the child to have the most opportunities for a great future are taken to the highest consideration by the court. Of course, the U.S. court system is fair and just – at least allegedly.

In his article, “Dads Want Their Dad,” William C. Smith, a lawyer and legal journalist in Narberth, Pennsylvania, talks about the ongoing struggle of fathers who have to fight the court in what they perceive as an “anti-father bias in custody rulings.” The fact remains that, though the legal jargon appears to convey fairness in principle, the reality is that there is still a gender bias in custody matters. Fathers have an uphill battle when it comes to winning the court’s attention long enough just to make an intelligent argument. The U.S. court system is fair and just.

In response to one court case, Artis details the account of a judge who suggested that only a “high negative” could influence him to rule for the father in the case (786). This judge indicated the he has a preference for the mother, “assuming she’s not nuts.” Another judge stated that, “In this situation, I can’t think of anything except a very high negative that would keep the child from being with the mother” Once again, the behind closed doors talk that ensues between judges, or in this case between judges and lawyers, reveals the truth behind what drives many of today’s court decisions regarding child custody. With this type of philosophy and psychology rooted in the minds of our judges, fathers don’t stand a chance.

But is not the result of this way of thinking the very reason fathers struggle with winning custody to begin with? Is it not a cycle that perpetuates itself? Today’s results are yesterday’s decisions to remove the father from the lives of their children. Fathers could not be involved with their children post-divorce, or a wedge was placed between the relationship of father and child. Visitation schedules did not work because many fathers had to work in order to pay legal fees, alimony, and child support, in addition to their own monthly obligations. More financial obligation requires more work, overtime, and sometimes more than one job, and time becomes a useless commodity not gracing the desire of the father to spend the much-needed time with his children.

Time not spent with the child is immediately dubbed “irresponsible” on the part of the father by the court, and it becomes one more weapon of warfare for the mother, who convinces the court that the father “would never be home enough for the children.” And it works. On one hand, the court system wants the father to establish a foundational security in order to meet the monetary and basic welfare needs of the child, but on the other it expects the father to be equally as domestic in nature as a stay-at-home-mother. Gavanas makes an interesting point, referencing a comment made by former Vice President Al Gore: The fatherhood responsibility movement is a reaction to the grievance that “the family” has become synonymous with mother and child and thus “feminized” (99). Gender bias is not only seen as a problem by your average, struggling, and responsible father seeking to gain custody, but also by fathers functioning in powerful leadership capacities, who have seen the deteriorating role of the father.

Nick Cohen, in his recent article, “Daddy Will Stop at Nothing to See You,” points out that “an extreme feminist bias pervades the system” (32). “Best interests” would allow for a child to spend an equal amount of time with both parents in the even a divorce occurred. Cohen adds that “break-ups are a crippling shock, both for the parent who is forced out of the child’s life and for the child itself.” The best interests of the child should inherently include the input of the two parents who brought the child in to the world – not just one. Still, the fact remains that it is not that way.

Most mothers raising children in single-parent homes, especially where the father has been estranged from the home, believe that they can fill both the role of the mother and father for the child. Jeffrey M. Leving, a fathers’ rights advocate in Chicago, cites jaw-dropping statistics on the results of fatherless children: “…who reportedly make up 72% of teenage murders and 60% of rapists, and are 11 times more likely to exhibit violent behavior than children from two-parent homes” (gtd. In Smith). Certainly, a father’s guidance and leadership example to the child is in the best interest of the child. The continual and consistent attention of the father in the life of his son naturally prevents him from seeking out acceptance from neighborhood gangs; certainly the regular love and affection from a father to his daughter keeps her from having to seek out acceptance and validation from many boyfriends.

It would make more sense that in the best interests of the child the court would rule in favor of “joint custody” as a standard, unless proven that either parent were not fit to act responsibly in their parental role. Most states have “joint custody” law, but any lawyer specializing in family law would tell one that joint custody is only effective if both parents get along and can remain civil. Even with joint custody, “the court is still more likely to treat the mother like the primary parent,” as James L. Wilks asserts in his article “Fathers Have Rights, Too.” “Too often men walk into the courtroom expecting equality and justice and walk out feeling they’ve been stripped of their fatherhood,” he states.

“Fathers’ rights claim family courts too often discourage divorced or unwed fathers from playing a positive role in their children’s lives, thus contributing to a nationwide “crisis of fatherlessness” (Smith). The problem is bigger than most people dare admit. Our nation is continually feeding into a cycle of dysfunctional families by keeping the father out of the family unit, post-divorce. The best interests of the child cannot be upheld with integrity until the court deals with both, the mother and father fairly.

Still today, feminist groups and courtroom judges have a sense that a father’s primary role is to support the child from a monetary standpoint and provide the basic necessities of life – the very philosophy of the late 1800s that has brought us to where we are today. In Debra Moss’s article, “Gender Bias,” she reveals the court’s finding on a custody case where a father’s visitation with his son was restricted because he was not the “breadwinner.” When a mother is given sole custody or residential custody of a child and continues to work, she is contributing to what this court determined would be “socially crippling” to the child in his adult life. Yet, this is the case in most single-parent homes, where the mother is the custodial parent. Why is this argument not upheld equally for the mother and the father? If the mother can go out and work and be a custodial parent, does the best interests of the child theory really hold up in all fairness?

“The best interests of the child” theory is weak and has become one of the grossest lies that has ever been sold in the American judicial system as a basis for determining custody matters. The best interests of the child should include both parents equally; the best interests of the child includes the involvement of a mother and a father. The best interests of the child means: children do not have to be ripped away from one parent or the other because of unfair and gender-biased character assessments made inside of a courtroom. The best interests of the child should enforce and encourage the rights of both parents to have an equal interest in the child. The best interests of the child is not about the underlying interests and ulterior motives of the parent; it is not about an opportunity for one parent to avenge their broken heart by using the child as a trophy to be won by them and lost by the other parent. The best interests of the child is about…the child’s best interest.

©Phillip Anthony, 2006, All Rights Reserved.

Works Cited

Artis, Julie E. “Judging The Best Interests Of The Child: Judges’ Accounts Of The Tender Years Doctrine.” Law & Society Review 2004: 769-807. Academic Search Elite. EBSCOhost. Cameron Univ. Lib., Lawton, OK. 25 Mar. 2005 . Cohen, Nick. “Daddy Will Stop At Nothing To See You.” New Statesmen 15 Nov. 2004: 31-32. Academic Search Elite. EBSCOhost. Cameron Univ. Lib., Lawton, OK. 22 Mar. 2005 2005. Gavanas, Anna. Fatherhood Politics In The United States. Urbana: University of Illinois, 2004. Moss, Debra C. “Gender Bias?” ABA Journal Sept. 1987: 21. Academic Search Elite. EBSCOhost. Cameron Univ. Lib., Lawton, OK. 22 Mar. 2005 http://search.epnet.com/ Smith, William C. “Dads Want Their Day.” ABA Journal Feb. 2003: 38-44. Academic Search Elite. EBSCOhost. Cameron Univ. Lib., Lawton, OK. 22 Mar. 2005 http://search.epnet.com Wilks, James L. “Fathers Have Rights, Too.” Essence Jun 1995: 134. Academic Search Elite. EBSCOhost. Cameron Univ. Lib., Lawton, OK. 22 Mar. 2005 http://search.epnet.com

What is the difference between feminizing hypnosis and regular hypnosis? In essence it is still the process of relaxing the conscious mind and putting suggestions in the subconscious, making permanent adjustments to behaviour.

If you feel you are more feminine than masculine or that within your male exterior you are more female feminizing hypnosis is your only option, it specifically explores femininity expressed through both the outer and inner self.

Like all hypnosis this starts on the inside and works outwards, making it safer and less time consuming than surgery or female hormones, and also less expensive. It will allow the inner woman to be expressed in everyday life making the walk, talk and mannerisms real rather than put on.

Over time you will start to experience life the way a woman does, you will communicate, feel, and see things the way a woman does. What you’ve been trying to achieve all these years will become a reality from the deepest unconscious place.

When using feminizing hypnosis you might like to start in a proper session and continue on with self-hypnosis but this will cost more and you have to share your reasons with the therapist, so they know how to guide the session in the right direction. Even though he or she is a professional disclosing the absolute truth might be embarrassing.

The alternative in feminizing hypnosis is self-hypnosis, which is inexpensive in comparison and will guarantee you complete privacy. The two techniques used once in a relaxed hypnotic state are visualization and scripts, in both being clear and specific about the intention is vital.

Visualize how you want to look and how you want to walk and talk. See it in as much detail as possible, once in the hypnotic state you can allow this to flow into your subconscious mind; it will create a behavioural change overtime with practice.

Be as specific when writing you script suggestions, these can be used to say to yourself or listen to when in the hypnotic state, for example; ‘I allow my inner woman to be who she is’ or ‘I love the woman within me’, something like that. If you started in a session you might be able to get a CD recording of it to listen to at home.

You are projecting subconscious motivations into your conscious mind affecting your day to day actions which is why you must be clear but also clear about how feminine you want to be, to what degree. Remember, it is going to affect your behaviour, mannerisms, voice, thoughts and feelings without you having to try.

If you have always felt more feminine than masculine and have only been able to express it in an exterior way this is your solution.

Feminizing hypnosis will tap into the subconscious mind allowing you to become more feminine at a deeper level with permanent results that will affect your exterior behaviour on all levels; you won’t have to think about it, it will just be a part of you naturally.

In this day and age that is very much feminized, it is not surprising to discover that many men have absolutely no idea how to really be masculine. For some men, only looking masculine is the definition of being masculine, yet it has just as much to do with your actions and attitude as it does looks. Become more masculine in all three areas, and you will have an easier time attracting the ladies than ever before!

Be more Decisive

The truth is that women seek out decisive men. This means that a man should not be scared to make a tough decision or take the lead. Of course, this is not a sign that they want an absolute dictator who only insists on his way; It just means they want a guy who is not tentative in his ways.

A lot of people-not just men-experience a good amount of hardship in making decisions, which results in postponing decisions and failing to seize the day with regard to opportunities that become available to them. Procrastinators will never find themselves in a position of power, yet, ironically, it is this power that the gals find so masculine about men.

Be more Self-Reliant

If you fail to be self-reliant in your approach as a man, then you are definitely not doing a good job of asserting your masculine power and dominance. The following are examples of a lack of self-reliance: You allow others to be accountable for things in your life that you should be accountable for, and you let the women in your life dictate what to do for the weekend and where to go on dates.

If you fail to be self-reliant, you will always fail to satisfy a woman's fundamental need to feel safe. To combat this problem, create a list in all of the situations in your life where you are handing over accountability to other people in areas that you should be managing yourself. This list will empower you to pick out areas in your life that offer you the chance to take control and, thus, become manlier.

Honesty

Is honesty really the best policy? Yes! The key to being honest is to make your words correspond to your actions, too. You will destroy your credibility if you only talk masculine, but fail to back that up with masculine actions.

For example, if you happen to say that you are going to do something, then be certain to follow through and actually do it. Never make a commitment unless you are totally ready to follow through on it. This should apply to commitments of all sizes.

If you assert that you will be at a certain place by a certain time, then make sure you are. If you say you will return somebody's phone call, then return the phone call. If you condition people, especially women, to realize that they can count on you, then you will be taken much more seriously and get more respect.

Erotic Hypnosis phone sex calls are my favourite calls. The experience ranges from a 5 minute quicky where the caller really is just fantasizing that he is hypnotized, going through the motions of being mind controlled, and getting off on the whole idea of it. At the other end of the spectrum are the recurring 45 minute sessions in which the caller submits to ever deepening hypnotic transes, divulges his inner desires, and responds to post hypnotic suggestion.

The most fascinating thing about hypnosis phone sex, is that for me, it is a wonderful tool for releasing hidden desires. Many callers will never admit what it is that they are hoping to experience. Manly guys do not want to say that they are interested in being feminized. Powerful business men find it difficult to ask to be dominated in any circumstance, especially sexually. Through hypnosis phone sex, however, these callers will ask to be hypnotized and taken control of. Often that is the only thing they say. “I want to be controlled by a beautiful woman.” It is only after they are in a trance, and answering truthfully without the ego censuring their desires, they tell me what they really ‘really’ want.

It is a terrifying feeling to know that you want something that you consider ‘abnormal’ or ‘freakish’. Men are conditioned into being straight manly men, powerful and strong. Not everyone can be that way all of the time, everyone has both strong and weak sides, masculine and feminine desires. Through hypnosis, the repressed desires can be brought to the front and enjoyed. Through hypnosis phone sex, the caller can remain anonymous and safe and enjoy the hypnotic session.

I have been asked to hypnotize callers into believing they are women, robots, inanimate objects, as well as into performing a variety of post hypnotic suggestions and responding to hidden triggers. For instance, one caller was taken with the desire to be ‘programmed’ into responding a certain way when he was in the presence of a certain beautiful woman. Another caller just wanted to be made to do embarrassing things so that he would know he was not acting under his own control.

Some callers are experimenting for the first time, others seem to call over and over with the exact same request, never tiring of the hypnotic sessions.

To get the most out of your erotic hypnosis phone sex session, I recommend the following preparations.

• Set aside atleast half an hour of private time. 45 minutes is ideal, but half an hour is plenty of time to experience a hypnotic state.
• Prepare a comfortable place to call from. Some people prefer a quiet bedroom, others a comfortable easy chair. It is important to remove possible distractions. You will need to be able to focus on the voice at the other end of the line.
• Make sure you telephone batteries are fully charged. Losing the connection part way through is extremely disappointing.
• Choose a phone sex hypnotist that you are comfortable with and call her. Let her know as best you can what you are hoping to experience.
• Arrange for payment of the call, discuss that with the hypnotist so that there are no ‘loose ends’ regarding the price you will pay for tour session.

As an erotic phone sex hypnotist, I can say that not everyone who calls for a hypnosis session goes into a trance. Also, some people act like they are in a trance, likely roleplaying and fantasizing, but not at all hypnotized. Others focus, listen and do go into wonderful hypnotic trances, obeying commands and experiencing the erotic session. I cannot always tell over the phone if the caller is hypnotized or not, I can however, always tell if the caller is enjoying his experience, and probably that is all that they care about in the end.

One of the major benefits to the caller is that he can be ‘commanded’ to do something that he has secretly always wanted to do, but was afraid to try. With the responsibility of his actions falling on the hypnotist’s shoulders, the caller is provided the freedom to experience his suppressed desires. It is very exciting to be able to temporarily at least, break free from stubborn inhibitions and go outside one’s comfort zone.

I don’t believe callers can be made to do anything they don’t deep down want to do, although of course that is the allure of erotic hypnosis!

In today society, a lot less people have started bodybuilding, and more people have started fitness model programs. Not a lot of people want to be huge with massive biceps and big chest anymore. Instead, they would rather want to have a lean, ripped physique of a cover shoot model. How has bodybuilding popularity declined in the last twenty years? I’ll show you how and why people shun bodybuilding and how you can make a difference.

Back in the “Golden Age” of bodybuilding, people were fascinated at how men can develop their muscles in way that makes people want to start bodybuilding themselves. Take a look at Eugen Sandow, the “father” of bodybuilding. He had a lean, muscular, ripped physique with insane ab muscles. Then came along other bodybuilding icons, like Steve Reeves, Reg Park, and many other famous athletes. But the real bodybuilding craze began with Arnold Schwarzenegger, after appearing in the bodybuilding movie “Pumping Iron”. Widely considered to be the greatest bodybuilder ever, he made bodybuilding and himself a household name. From that point on, people opened many gyms everywhere to start bodybuilding, whether it’s to go professional or just to build muscle. Movie directors recruited bodybuilders like Arnold to star in their movies. For a long time, the bodybuilding era was spreading all over the world.

But what went wrong? How did this era slowly dwindle away? Simple. People started getting “too big, too muscular”, which made people think that it looks impulsive, overbearing, and to add it all up, disgusting. Today, bodybuilders want to be bigger and muscular than their opponents. Bodybuilders like Jay Cutler and Ronnie Coleman are perfect examples of people are “overdone” their muscle growth and development. What really put a stop to this era was the movie “Fight Club” with Brad Pitt, where the lean, muscular body was introduced, and people realized that you don’t have to big, you just have to get lean. My opinion is that men have become “feminized”, meaning they want a body that will look more attractive to a woman and people start modeling like women, which is easy to understand why men today wear pink t-shirts or shirts that say “Real men wear pink”. This is absurd!

Let’s talk about Arnold for a moment. Why do you think he was considered the best bodybuilder? Was it because he had the biggest muscles? Or than he had a confident presence when he went on the bodybuilding stage? Maybe it could be that he gave the best advice on building muscle? It was any one of these three reasons. In the movie “Pumping Iron”, Arnold talked about having the perfect physique. He said, “You have to get you proportions right. If you look in the mirror and say “Okay, I need a little bit more deltoids. So you would go to the gym and put those deltoids on. Where as an artist would just slap his brush on a picture there it’s done. We have to do it the hard way because we building the human body. Now some people will look at you funny like you’re doing something strange, but it’s not really something a lot of people know about. And once you find out about it, you understand so much about bodybuilding that you haven’t realized before”.

You see? Arnold had the perfect proportional body, and bodybuilding enthusiasts knew that. He differs a lot compared to today’s bodybuilders, who build their bodies out of proportion. So how can you make a difference in building muscle? Get you proportions right. Let every muscle be just right, not smaller or bigger than it needs to be. Hope you enjoyed this article and will properly make the best in building muscle.

The three vampire women who inhabit the more remote regions of Count Dracula’s castle are of great significance to the narrative. Stoker’s depiction of them could be considered to embody the very worst Victorian nightmares regarding womanhood. Jonathan Harker’s reactions after his encounter with them also convey late nineteenth-century anxieties concerning the feminization of men.

Female gender identities were narrowly defined in Victorian society. Women were generally considered to be of two types, either the doting wife and mother, or the fallen woman. The vampire women, or ‘weird sisters’, as Harker calls them – referencing the three witches from Macbeth – could be considered an exaggerated literary equivalent of these fallen women. With their “brilliant white teeth” (p.37) and “voluptuous lips” (p.37), they are portrayed as overtly sexual beings. Their appearance and behavior stand in stark contrast to that of Jonathan’s fiancée, the virtuous Mina, who he describes as having “naught in common” (p.53) with the vampire women.

During his seduction, Jonathan’s reactions to the weird sisters are decidedly ambivalent: “There was a deliberate voluptuousness which was both thrilling and repulsive” (p.38). He encounters them in a far-flung chamber of Castle Dracula whilst in an ambiguous state of consciousness, a common motif in Gothic literature: “I suppose I must have fallen asleep; I hope so, but I fear, for all that followed was startlingly real” (p.37). Viewed from within a Victorian context, Harker is portrayed in a somewhat feminized position, with the gender roles reversed, in that he is a man being seduced by women, when in nineteenth-century society men would be expected to assume the role of seducer.

It is arguable that the actions of the vampire women in their seduction of Harker represent newfound anxieties about the emergence of the New Woman. The New Woman was a type of woman who challenged the prevailing Victorian notions of womanhood. Although Mina could be considered a New Woman, with her financial independence gained from having a career before marriage, she discusses this class of women with disdain. Regarding attitudes to marriage, she states that “I suppose the New Woman won’t condescend in future to accept; she will do the proposing herself” (p.89). It would appear that in their seduction of Harker, the female vampires could be considered New Women in light of Mina’s remarks.

Within the context of Gothic literature, Stoker confronts several conventions, one of these being through the role of Jonathan Harker in Dracula’s castle. In eighteenth-century Gothic novels, such as Ann Radcliffe’s influential The Mysteries of Udolpho, it is a young woman – of a ‘tremulous sensitivity’ and much prone to fainting – who finds herself ensnared in a remote castle and at the mercy of male predators. In Dracula Stoker has subverted convention by having a male character in this role, a detail consolidated by Harker’s reaction to his grisly encounter with the vampire women: “the horror overcame me, and I sank down unconscious” (p.39). He is a man assuming the role typically occupied by women in Gothic narrative.

Mina’s role as a New Woman is supported further during her encounter with the weird sisters much later in the story. The vampire women are shown to beckon to Mina, referring to her as ‘sister’ in their invitation to join their ranks.

Jonathan’s “agony of delightful anticipation” (p.38) when being seduced by the vampires is echoed in Van Helsing’s own anxieties when staking the undead women. He also notes the women’s sexual appeal in similar tones to Harker: “She was so fair to look on, so radiantly beautiful, so exquisitely voluptuous”, (p.370). If Victorian masculinity could be undermined through the threat posed by sexually attractive women, then Van Helsing’s staking of the female vampires could be considered a reassertion of male patriarchy.

You want to know how to feminize your house husband. You are no longer thrilled by the unnecessary banter of boys being boys and thoughts of superiority. Perhaps you just want to sit down with your man and talk about that new movie just just came out. Regardless, I will tell you what advice I know.

But you are unsure how to do it. After all, there’s not really a book on “How do I make my man drop the beer and pick up the chick flick”? There is a variety of things you could do to get your man in touch with his inner woman!

You could do something delicate together. Don’t go get him a manicure, but maybe you take an art class together (sure, he’ll likely be more excited if it’s a nude portrait class but you don’t have to take that one!). Do something soothing and enjoyable for the both of you. Let him show his artistic side.

Talk to him about it. I don’t enjoy the idea of going behind someone’s back to do anything. It is dishonest. If you want him to stop acting like a man so much, let him know! He will probably stare at you funny but I guarantee that if he loves you he’ll make a few changes on his own with time.

Don’t treat him like a lady. He will probably see this as more of an insult rather than anything. Don’t steal his entire playboy collection and replace it with a feminine magazine. Though that would be hilarious, it is not wise to do anything upsetting or feminizing your man will backfire and he won’t be very happy.

In a nutshell, that’s how to feminize your house husband. There are many strategies to go about but just keep in mind to be honest to him, and to you. Some men are just too “manly” and there’s no getting around that (*flexes*).

There is an amazing breakthrough in the process of feminization – feminization hypnosis. Commonly, some men would simply undergo male to female surgery and modify their facial features and body contours. Some also opt to have hormonal injections to enhance their look. Today, a number of transgender, transsexuals and transvestites are discovering for themselves the good benefits they can gain from feminization hypnosis.

Feminization hypnosis is programming your subconscious mind to bring out the woman in you. Your mind and body can efficiently respond to affirmations and visualization when you are under hypnosis. At this stage, you are entering a relaxed environment where you can condition your mind to become the woman that you always wanted to be.

Your desire to become a feminine is very important in this process. An image of who you want to become should always be deeply imbedded in your subconscious mind. Feminization hypnosis unleashes your natural power to activate the flow feminized hormones into your entire being.

After a few successful sessions you would discover the woman in you that is there all along. You would begin to feel and act like a woman. In terms of emotional change, you would learn to become more sensitive, caring, thoughtful and other characteristics that a woman portrays. You would begin to exude the aura of a total woman. And with such an aura, you would gain the power of attraction.

You would not only benefit from feminization hypnosis in terms of behavioral transformation. A lot of people attest that they are experiencing physical improvements after undergoing feminization hypnosis.

You would soon sound like a woman with a higher and softer pitch. The way you walk would change drastically. The way you react to situations would be similar to that of a woman. In all you do, there is a touch of femininity that would surely be noticed by a lot of people. Your confidence would surely boost because of the overwhelming feminine aura within you. You would feel comfortable in your own woman skin. More importantly, you would soon achieve that x-factor that can naturally attract men.

With feminization hypnosis, you would indeed become the woman of your dreams. You can forget about wearing layers of make up or applying hormonal creams. You can enjoy your life as a woman in the most natural way. Allow your feminine side to surface and enjoy the pleasures of being a woman.