Most men not only wish to produce a larger volume of semen but are also concerned about the consistency of their semen. Thick semen is what is considered to be better in terms of fertility, health and sperm count as compared to thin or watery ejaculate.

Moreover, most women find a larger volume of thick semen visually stimulating and a great turn on. Just as men fancy bigger breasts, women like larger loads of semen. They seem to consider larger volume of thick semen to be a symbol of your male power and virility.

Not only this, larger quantity of thicker semen can help you enjoy more intense orgasms during ejaculation.

Your diet can play a very important role in helping you increase the quantity and consistency of semen you produce.

Foods that are rich in zinc are great for increasing the volume of your ejaculate. Such foods include oysters, animal protein, dairy, poultry products etc.,

Pumpkin seeds, beans, nuts, celery etc., are also known to do wonders for increasing the volume of your seminal fluid.

Not only this, your diet should also contain adequate amounts of selenium, Vitamins C, E, B12, folic acid and amino acids like l-arginine and l-carnitine.

Though foods help, often you need more than these foods to meet the nutritional demands of your body.

This is why herbal or natural supplements can be a big help. There are some herbal supplements that are packed with finest herbal extracts and other nutrients such as zinc and l-arginine that not only increase semen production but also ensure rock hard erections.

Such herbal supplements are getting increasingly popular with more and more men opting for them.

Check out more on how to Make Semen Thick and the best herbal supplements that can ensure overall sexual enhancement without any side effects. 

The lower half of the body dictates a lot of what we need on the upper half. For a more successful fit, start with skirts.

Get the lower body fit and then move to the upper body.

Have you found out that you have one hip larger than the other? This is not uncommon. You may be adding extra fabric for that larger side.

However, the larger hip fit does not stop with skirts and pants. It also applies to all of your longer tops, blouses, shirts, jackets and coats. In other words, you need to add for that larger hip on everything that comes close to your body and goes over your hips. Don’t forget to do that!

A balanced alteration at both side seams for a full hip width alteration doesn’t work with unbalanced hips (one larger than the other). You may be adding width to both sides (the balanced alteration) plus adding more width to accommodate the larger side (unbalanced alteration). You must alter longer tops and jackets, etc. the same way as your skirts and pants.

If you have a full tummy, or a full bust, you also need to add more to the front of your shirt or jacket than the back. A balanced alteration for full width can’t help that either. Think of the “beer bellied” guy or the pregnant gal. They simply need more fabric in the front.

To have a shirt or jacket hang properly on your body, you need to know where you need more or less fabric. Find out exactly what you need and where you need it. Apply that to your sewing pattern.

It looks funny, you say? Look in the mirror! Does the altered pattern better reflect what you see in the mirror? Go with it! Accept it! And, you will see a Misfit become Miss Fit.

It just makes sense!

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

– by Marian Lewis

©2005 Marian Lewis – All Rights Reserved

1st Step To Sewing Success

We see and read about what appears to be obvious lapses of ethical behavior almost on a daily basis and ask “how is that possible”? It appears obvious to anyone learning about these stories for the first time that there was a breech of what is appropriate behavior and we wonder how so many people could be so unethical. We also believe that we certainly would act differently if we were in the same situation.

One reason why otherwise normal individuals may be caught in unethical behavior is because of a social learning process that occurs in all teams and groups. Members of teams and groups learn acceptable and expected behavior by other members and leaders of the team. Over time, a culture evolves that either encourages or discourages certain behavior. Members are even pressured either consciously or subconsciously to conform to what is accepted by the larger group. If the social group in which an individual belongs does not punish negative behavior, or even reinforces inappropriate behavior through the use of direct or indirect rewards, many people who may not behalf inappropriately in normal circumstances, may cross the line and behalf inappropriately in other circumstances.

The Tailhook Association is an association of naval aviators whose annual convention became the center of a sexual scandal because of the 90 sexual harassment charges that resulted from their 1991 convention. In all, 140 aviators were charged. While these men were not participating in such behavior outside of the convention, while at the convention, they felt their behavior was appropriate and undeserving of punishment. These types of incidents had long been known to those in the Navy and those familiar with the organization. The group never had been disciplined for treating women inappropriately.

In fact, most everyone in the military accepted the behavior as appropriate for this type of group and convention. Over the years, a culture had developed within the group that permitted sexually inappropriate behavior to occur. While no one in command would have explicitly rewarded the activity, no one would reprimand anyone for it either. Because it was permitted, the convention became a safe haven for behavior that would have been considered inappropriate in other circumstances. Members “learned” through the lack of punishment and through the tacit acceptance of the behavior that the behavior was accepted and even expected at a Tailhook Convention. It was a place where they could “let their hair down” and have fun, even though they may not have acted the same elsewhere. (Trevino and Nelson, 2005, p. 169).

The public was outraged as to how the men could act the way they did and how the Navy could have allowed such behavior to continue. While the activities seemed obviously inappropriate and unethical to anyone learning about the story for the first time, very few of the men were ever seriously held accountable for the incident. How could the group have developed a culture of such inappropriate behavior? Because, the individuals in the group had received reinforcement through many years of the organization that such behavior was accepted and even expected at Tailhook Conventions. The military did nothing to stop it, which actually encouraged the behavior more. After 1991, they slowly began to change, but still took no drastic action to discipline those involved. This lack of discipline likely reinforced the viewpoint of those involved that the behavior was acceptable and should not be punished.

The implications for other organizations and managers are clear. Rewarding unethical behavior will reinforce the behavior within the organization. Furthermore, even looking the other way and allowing the behavior to continue is a form of reward because it sends the message that the behavior is acceptable. Over time, the behavior can be ingrained in the culture and individuals, who otherwise would otherwise not do so, may begin to feel pressure to conform. Managers must not allow unethical behavior to continue without taking action to correct it. This should include taking actions against those who participate. If the Navy had taken action to punish those involved in sexual harassment at the convention, a clear message would have been sent that the behavior would no longer be accepted, and improvements in behavior may have begun to occur. The same in true in all organizations; managers that may look the other way, while inappropriate behavior occurs in their teams, are inviting unethical behavior to become part of the learned organizational behavior of their teams. Unless, they act to prevent and correct unethical behavior, individuals will continue and new members will be taught and encouraged to begin unethical behavior.

References:

Trevino, L., and Nelson, K., (2005). Corporate social responsibility and managerial ethics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Idaho public schools created a plan to introduce more educational technology into their school system. The growing need for more and more technology in the classroom is apparent and it costs money. Technology in the classroom is greatly beneficial and helps prepare students for the future and helps them gain knowledge that will be utilized everyday in their adult life, if it isn’t already. The chief of the Idaho public schools devised a plan stating in order to pay for this educational technology to be integrated into their schools they will require teachers to have larger class sizes. The question is, does the benefit of educational technology outweigh the cons of having a larger class size?

We know that with larger class sizes, the students get less individualized attention. Some students require more attention than others. All students learn differently and at different paces and with more students for the teachers to look after and tech, it becomes unmanageable. Not to mention it would be more difficult to get all the students to pay attention and diffuse chatter and distractions if there is a larger class size. With distractions aside, how will teachers be able to manage all the time with the students? If they need to take a field trip, there are more kids to look after or if they need to schedule five-minute presentations per person, then they will have to do so in two different days, which could then result in a loss of other lessons that would be beneficial for the students learning on particular subject.

What about the benefits of educational technology? We live in a new era and it’s important we stick with the times. We ant be writing on a chalkboard and teaching our students if the world doesn’t revolve around that anymore. Most jobs use projectors and PowerPoint in meetings and projects. It’s important to pass on these skills to the student’s so their transition from their educational life to their careers and adults life is a smooth transition. Schools need to make the technological reforms and get technology integrated into their classrooms as soon as possible because if students aren’t learning with technology, then life after school is going to be a shock. In a technology rich world, we need to pass on these skills to the students to keep up with it.

As there is concern for larger class sizes and what cons they have, wouldn’t technology greatly benefit the larger class size? Personal educational technological devices can give the students the individualized attention they need and help the students to learn at their own pace and track their data. By working with computers students can be independent and figure things out with help from the Internet. By integrating projectors and 3-d technology it will capture the students attention and cause less distractions. So all excuses aside, the larger class sizes wouldn’t be a big con for the benefits of having educational technology integrated into the classrooms.